            |
|
|
|
 |
Pendulum Audio Quartet II Tube
Recording Channel
by Mike
Caffrey , Tape-Op March/April 2005 |
The Pendulum Audio Quartet II (Mercenary Audio Edition) sounds
outrageously beautiful. The Quartet II is four independent analog
processing elements: a tube mic pre, a tube EQ, a tube compressor
and a solid state limiter. It takes up two rack spaces and has
both XLR and 1/4 inch I/Os giving it more flexibility than any
other multi-element deviceI've ever seen. Greg Gualtieri designed
the Quartet II with the intent of having one piece that he could
bring to a session and know that he could get a great sound out
of anything he had to record. The Quartet II easily meets that
goal.
The mic pre has what I've come to think of as the modern design
- having both a gain control and an output control so that you
can drive the input for extra coloration while controlling the
output like the gain and master volume controls on a guitar amp.
The impedance is switchable between 1500 and 10k ohms. One feature
that I haven't seen before is switchable input transformers.
The first transformer is labeled "Full" and the other
is labeled "Focused" with the Focused transformer providing
a little more gain. When switching between the two while miking
a snare drum, I'd describe the difference along the lines of
switching between Neve (Full) and API (Focused) pres. Both transformers
sounded great on every source I tried them on and it wasn't always
easy to choose which was the better option (a nice problem to
have). The front panel has all the standard phantom, polarity
and high pass filter (75hz or 150hz) controls. The are also switches
for selecting mic or line (the single XLR input can be either)
and DI inputs. One unusual feature is there are two 1/4 inch
DI ins, (front/back) which are loaded differently so that they
each have
their own tone.
The passive inductor based EQ has three unique bands and two
modes. The low shelving band can boost and cut simultaneously
like a Pultec (freqs: 20hz, 30hz, 50hz, 100hz and 120hz). The
mid dip cuts only and has a continuously variable Q, labeled
intuitively - "Broad" to "Sharp" (freqs:
200hz, 350hz, 500hz, 650hz, and 800hz). The high peak band boosts
only, with a continuously variable Q like the mid band (freqs:
.8k, 1.4k, 2k, 3k, 4k, 5k, 8, 10k, 12k, 15k and 18k). The EQ
can be positioned before or after the compressor in the signal
path and can be switched between its "Passive" and
it's "Aggressive" mode which increases the saturation
of theEQ and adds harmonic content.
The Delta Mu compressor is basically identical to a single
channel fromthe Pendulum ES-8 compressor. It's an actual tube
compressor, which is a rare thing because most compressors calling
themselves "tube" don'tactually use a tube for gain
control (just the output stage). It has 5 modes - Fast and Manual
like the ES-8, and also Faster, Vintage (program-dependent) and
Average (RMS) modes.
The peak limiter is the only non-tube element in the Quartet
II (of course- in order for it to be fast enough) and can switch
between JFET andMOSFET operation.
How does it sound? As I said earlier, beautiful. It's my first
choice for a natural sound that's not devoid of character. The
Quartet II has a tube vibe (the real tube vibe) that people aren't
always familiar with. Tube gear is usually described as sounding
warm, which it often does, but that's more often a result of
the transformers and other circuitry (see Neve for an example
of how circuitry crates warmth without tubes). It's not uncommon
for this circuitry to add extra coloration through poor high
end response, a muddy low end and large quantities of harmonic
distortion- all problems that the Quartet II does not suffer
from. As a result ofthe Pendulum approach to tubes, the Quartet
II has a beautiful three dimensional quality that I've never
heard from any other piece of recording gear. It was the first
thing I noticed when I tried it out by running my Gibson SG into
the rear DI. Between driving the pre a little, some simultaneous
low boost and cut from the EQ and a few dB of compression in
the average mode, I was able to get a sound reminiscent of a
clean sound from a Fender Deluxe. It was such a nice tone that,
had I been in a session, I would have considered tracking it
and I've always hated direct guitar tones. As I played through
my monitors (bone dry) I realized that the guitar sat differently
than dry signals usually sit. It's hard to describe, but it was
like there was an air around the sound. It wasn't obnoxiously
forward like a DI sound usually is. It was kind of like it was
hovering in the vacuum of space (vacuum tubes - coincidence?).
It was clear that it was going to be great for sitting vocals
in the mix, especially when going for a dry in your face sound
which was the next thing I tried. That tube quality with a little
peak limiting made it easy to sit the vocals forward in the mix
and allowed me the option of leaving them dry without sounding
awkward.
I invited John Lardieri of Twin A by for some vocal comparisons.
We ran a TLM 103 through three paths. First a super mint, all
original 1073 through an 1176. Then through an Avalon 737 and
finally through the Quartet II trying both input transformers.
John's first reaction was that the Quartet II sounded "richer"
than the Neve and I definitely agreed. The Avalon sounded tinny
and a little brittle next to the Quartet II. Both of these comparisons
were made with the "Full" transformer. We then A/B'd
the vocal through the "Full" and "Focused"
transformers. They both sounded great. John preferred the "Focused"
transformer because he likes his voice when it's less "husky"
sounding. The "Focused" transformer had a slightly
tighter low end and a little push in the mids. We also tried
it on snare where it sounded full and robust and with a boost
at 8K brought out out the snare rattle better than I could with
a 1073. I tried duplicating thesound of my Shure Level Loc with
the "faster" compression setting, and couldn't quite
do it, but I was able to get a truly nasty distorted sound by
turning everything all the way up. I tried bass DI'd through
the frontand it sounded great. I experimented with guitar though
a Pod which the Quartet II made acceptable. I couldn't find a
use that the Quartet II didn't excel at.
Another feature that sets the Quartet II apart from every
other recording channel I've seen, is that you can run all four
components independently. The main I/Os are the XLRs, but there
are also the 1/4 inch I/Os for each device in the path. So, for
example, you could use it as a complete signal path while recording,
and then when mixing you could use the EQ on oneinstrument, the
compressor on another, the pre for it's transformer tone options
on a third and the brickwall limiter on a fourth. It's important
to understand that you're getting four separate top of the line
pieces in one box, because you'll find that the Quartet II's
price is in line with
purchasing the four devices separately.
The Quartet II was designed to be a jack of all trades. Often
that means mastering none, but the Quartet II has mastered any
use I could come up with. It's inherent Pendulum tube tone will
make it a classic piece of gear and, in an era where studios
are competing with each other as well as with home studios, the
Quartet II is the caliber of gear that will give people a reason
to hire you for a sound they can't get elsewhere. When you compare
the Quartet II to other other pieces of gear at the same quality
and price level (say a new reissue 1073) it's clearly an exceptional
value. I'm also very curious how a pair would fare as as a masteringsignal
path (I'd love to hear some non-L1/L2 limiting). Congratulations
to Greg on another exceptional design and a nod to Fletcher at
Mercenary Audio for his consistency with being involved the best
gear. - Mike Caffrey
|